Source: WSJ |
The investigators approached the hand hygiene compliance dilemma from a psychological perspective- emphasizing patient health. The study authors describe two experiments that pitted a sign stating that “Hand hygiene prevents you from catching diseases” against one stating that “Hand hygiene prevents patients from catching diseases.”
Hand hygiene adherence increased significantly (to 89.2% from 80.7%) with the patient-consequences sign but didn’t change significantly with the personal-consequences sign.
Interesting and simple enough in approach. Will the effect last on a long term basis? Will the incremental benefit still hold in the event that HH adherence is already at 90%.
I look forward to reading the fine details of the study once published