I think that no one can argue that humanism is an integral part of medicine. Unlike medical science, based in biology, biochemistry, physiology and pharmacology, humanism is difficult to teach, and even more challenging to quantify and evaluate.
This should not necessarily be a deterrent to promoting humanism in medical education. I came across this report and perspective from the University of Michigan.
At Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, I teach a 4th year elective titled Exploring the Human Condition;Medicine in Literature. The aim is to stimulate thought and reflection on humanism through great works of literature. Of course, these courses self select students who are likely self described readers and thinkers, so in many ways, it may be a case of 'preaching to the choir.'
Whether classes such as these can have any impact on the alleviation of pain and suffering is largely unknown and essentially unquantifiable.
Although this is a small measure of progress, last year I had one student, this year, 18 are enrolled.
Who would have guessed?
At Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, I teach a 4th year elective titled Exploring the Human Condition;Medicine in Literature. The aim is to stimulate thought and reflection on humanism through great works of literature. Of course, these courses self select students who are likely self described readers and thinkers, so in many ways, it may be a case of 'preaching to the choir.'
Whether classes such as these can have any impact on the alleviation of pain and suffering is largely unknown and essentially unquantifiable.
Although this is a small measure of progress, last year I had one student, this year, 18 are enrolled.
Who would have guessed?
