![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0rY9iLmtliOe1aUmmObpZx8REQ4myk25d7-s-6TtRbK6CCbtO9qDuaozK9JXHOOUahNsID_fhg16hn9XfeIwpqxORAbMvr18zhGbA7Vi4fC1QWlaB1-90J4-LKyM4_rSXJ_OoO7dwQqc/s1600/Hospital.jpg)
Of the 3,374 eligible hospitals, 975 provided data (29% response rate). Some of the results are worth highlighting:
- The average number of infection preventionists (IPs) per 100 beds was 1.2, below published guidelines
- Certification of infection prevention (IP) staff varied across institutions - about 1/3rd of institutions had no certified IPs
- The average hours per week devoted to data management and secretarial support were generally low, little time was spent on prevention education
- Only 32% of hospitals reported having an electronic data surveillance system
- There was variation in infection prevention practice with generally poor adherence to many of the infection prevention policies
- Although policies exists for the prevention of catheter associated bloodstream infections and ventilator associated pneumonias, many institutions reported a low uptake of catheter associated urinary tract infection prevention policies, surprising as these infections are common and was the first hospital acquired infection for non-payment
The state of infection prevention in US Hospitals, despite heightened public interest, is varied and sub-optimal.
Eye-opening.