Source: Nature.com |
I fortuitously came across the above reports after reading this thought provoking post by Eli Parencevich on the retraction rate of scientific articles, particularly in high impact journals.
The motives behinds scientific misconduct are multiple and include career advancement, recognition and the opportunity for larger, more prestigious grants. This is compounded by a peer-review process that is not sufficiently rigorous to uncover errors in methodology as described here in the Economist.
When the scientific method is corrupted by falsification, bias and conflict of interest, there is a betrayal of trust in science and medicine and a resultant compromise of the common good.