![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhE8VSXx2PzxpbRCKG_z_Qx25zL6bamdJdHhbsOJgKBgTwOApotd-3I66sXl7iy-kEAfT0SDzq5ezL3rBNSfyJqfM3tI8BXbPaOgTilyuJBSG0OovN29XvMA5Df7dw4vFHmyCBYqJhoBhM/s280/Staphylococcus.jpg)
This recent paper in Clinical Infectious Diseases suggests otherwise. The investigators reported a 78% relative decrease in 28 day mortality between bacteremic sepsis in transplant recipients versus non-transplant recipients.
Although transplant recipients may be immunosuppressed and at risk for opportunistic infections, particularly from viruses and fungi, in the event of bacteremic sepsis they fare better than non-transplanted hosts.Why? It is quite likely that the immunocompromised state down regulates the inflammatory response of sepsis, improving survival.
Once again, empiric data and observation contradict intuition.