![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjgKBH3ES9LiVnA0F1ebV9SLsFYWgn3d6TTr5Gk5fhTKw5sXeG70XgAiHibvdclZPCYKQFRqFTrLycjFD36XjeI6GDAWzYSI3ATdw-wVprJQXEIX9JUDvfw8FX2lIZA6FY9L7AQZZTfO0/s280/Gurney.jpg)
Most technologies for surfaces and fabrics have been assessed in vitro and have been shown to reduce bacterial numbers by two logs or more. However, apart from copper -impregnated surfaces, few antimcorbial textiles have been studied in a clinical setting. Salgado et al published a study that assessed the impact of copper surfaces in ICUs on the rate of hospital acquired infections (HAIs). I have previously commented on this study.
We published a study on the impact of antimicrobial scrubs on heathcare worker hand and apparel bioburden. We did not assess HAI outcomes.
An important question lingers: even with effective antimicrobial textiles, what is the expected incremental impact of these technologies on HAI rates atop a robust infection prevention program with robust hand hygiene, disinfection, central line checklists, HAI bundles, chlorhexidine patient bathing, etc?
We published a study on the impact of antimicrobial scrubs on heathcare worker hand and apparel bioburden. We did not assess HAI outcomes.
An important question lingers: even with effective antimicrobial textiles, what is the expected incremental impact of these technologies on HAI rates atop a robust infection prevention program with robust hand hygiene, disinfection, central line checklists, HAI bundles, chlorhexidine patient bathing, etc?